Token analysis
What Scouty reads about a single token
Give Scouty a ticker or a contract address and it builds a report from GMGN and DexScreener.
What is $PONS?
Tell me about 0x020bfc650a365f8bb26819deaabf3e21291018b4
What comes back
| Line | What it means |
|---|---|
| Price, market cap, liquidity, 24h volume | From the deepest pool on the chain |
| Holders | How many addresses hold the token |
| Top 10 holders | Share of supply in the ten largest wallets |
| Momentum | Price change across 5m, 1h, 6h and 24h |
| Buy/Sell pressure | Buys against sells over the same windows |
| ATH | Peak market cap, and how far below it the token trades now |
| Launchpad | The launchpad it was minted on, when it was minted on one |
| Bluechip holders | Share of holders who also hold established tokens |
Not every line is present for every token. GMGN has no report for some contracts, and the answer says so rather than filling in the blanks.
Wash trading
Is the volume on $PONS real or wash traded?
GMGN runs a circular-trading check, and the answer has three states worth telling apart:
- Yes — the volume is fabricated. Treat the volume figure as meaningless.
- No — the check ran and found none. The volume is real trading.
- No check — GMGN has not analysed this token. Scouty says so, and does not call it clean.
Holders
Who are the top holders of $PONS?
The ten largest wallets with their share, plus the concentration figure. Read it as concentration, not as intent: a top-10 share of 80% means ten addresses can move the price, whoever they are.
Momentum
Are people buying $PONS right now?
How far below its all-time high is $PONS?
Both read from the same report — the first the buy/sell pressure line, the second the drawdown from peak market cap.
Tickers and collisions
A $TICKER is resolved to a contract before anything is fetched. Symbols are not unique on any chain and are copied deliberately on this one, so:
- When one contract's 24h volume dominates the others carrying that symbol, Scouty takes it and names the address it used.
- When none dominates, it asks you for the contract address instead of picking.
- When the symbol belongs to a well-known token elsewhere and only to a copy here, the answer says which one it is looking at.
Pasting the contract address skips all of this.
Launchpads
The launchpad comes from GMGN's own field — noxa, flap, bankr, virtuals — and is reported as context. It is never inferred from the shape of a contract address, and it is not a safety signal in either direction.
Scouty gives no safety verdict on a contract. Asked whether a token is safe, a rug or a honeypot, it says in a line that it does not assess contract safety, then gives the live read.